DOCUDRAMA: THE REAL (HI)STORY
Ãiçek Co?kun
OUTLINE
1. INTRODUCTION
1. comments to Docudrama
2. Antecedents to Docudrama
2. DOCUDRAMA TECHNIQUES AND ANALYSES OF THE FILMS
1. Metonyms and Metaphors
1. Casting
2. naming and Compositing
2.1.3 Captions
2.1.3.1 The Voice-Over/Narrator
2.1.3.2 Date and Place Captions
2.1.3.3 Sound/Music Captioning
3. CONCLUSION
4. BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definitions to Docudrama
It has been nearly seven[1] decades since put-on Grierson first applied the marge documentary to movies. Still, the comment of the term remains a vexed and controversial issue, not middling among film theorists but also among people who make and date documentaries (Eitzen, 1995: 81). Besides the complexity and onerousy of the definition of documentaries, it is also difficult to define genres of the issue. By the time going, new genres and techniques were added into the documentary genre. This training led to documentary filmmakers into mixing these genres and techniques in documentaries.

One of the roughly common and important a documentary genre is docudrama. Definition of the docudrama term is as difficult as the definition of documentary term.
One of the earliest definitions of docudrama was given by Edgar E. Willis in the early 1950s. Willis based his definition more on content than on form when he called it a political platform presenting information or exploring an issue in a dramatic fashion, with story emphasis usually on the social meaning of the problem, (Willis, 1951: 101 in Bartlett Musburger, 1984: 10)[2].
Moreover, according to Kaiser (1980: 42 in Bartlett Musburger, 1984: 10)[3], docudrama is the dramatization of actual events using actors and actresses as opposed to a pure documentary, which uses real people and events. check to this definition, docudrama is a combination of...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .